There have been many influential and inspirational activists
who have committed themselves for the sake of what they believe it whether it
be fighting for their human rights, or trying to fight against fear; each
activist has definitely succeeded in one thing, being an activist. Two
particular influential and inspirational activists who dedicated their lives to
their work were the wonderful Aung San Suu Kyi and the incredible Malcolm X. Aung
San Suu Kyi’s Freedom from Fear
speech accentuates the idea of fear playing a great role in the development of
a nation and person, while Malcolm X’s The
Ballot or the Bullet speech reveals that the white man is the reason behind
the oppression of the Black community; it is revealed through these two texts
that the oppression and development of individuals are based on fear.
Even though Aung San Suu Kyi and Malcolm X’s speeches
emphasize fear as the biggest obstacle for an individual, they both have some
differences as well. Suu Kyi believes that “the root of human responsibility [is
based on] the concept of perfection, the urge to achieve it, the intelligence
to find a path towards it, and the will to follow that path,” while Malcolm X
believes the root of human, particularly the African Americans’ responsibility is
to go against the false promises of the white man and get their deserved
rights, by going “towards either the ballot or the bullet,” to make that change.
Suu Kyi sees action as going against fear that leads to corruption, and Malcolm
X believes in going against the apparently “most powerful legislator,” the
white man.
Aung San Suu Kyi’s Freedom
from Fear speech powerfully underlines the idea that “it is not power that
corrupts but fear.” Suu Kyi believed
that fear was the reason behind the development of a nation, but most importantly
an individual. Suu Kyi’s quintessential revolution starts in the “spirit, born
of an intellectual conviction,” which means that the basis of fear comes from
the mind. Suu Kyi says that not only does fear result in corruption, “deviation
from the right path,” or “aberration due to ignorance,” fear is also the main
obstacle in an individual’s path from doing what’s right. Suu Kyi’s political philosophy
supports this idea of fear being the main obstacle to the right path for an
individual, which she has ultimately overcome. Malcolm X implicitly states that
the reason behind the lack of activism in the Black community was because of
fear of the white man. He, like Suu Kyi believes “in action on all fronts by
whatever means necessary,” because to overcome fear “merely bodily courage [isn't enough] but absence of fear from the mind” is essential too. Both influential
activists believed that fear was the reason behind an individual’s choices to
do right, or do nothing. However, both activists’ speeches complement each
other in the sense that both believe that fear is the greatest obstacle holding
an individual from acting against injustice, whether politically or mentally.
Samiha, I thought your thesis was both specific and qualified, so nice job! I thought it was really interesting how you decided to focus on how both speakers focus on fear. It is clearly evident that Suu Kyi sees fear as the root cause of corruption, but you were able to take that concept of fear and analyze how Malcolm X viewed it.
ReplyDeleteI think you did a really good job with the organization of your blog. I like how you did a paragraph on their differences first, which are more evident, before doing a paragraph on your main point of fear. By stating the more obvious points first, you left the reader with your main point to think about by putting your deeper thinking at the end of the blog.
Also, I like how you use quotes in your blog. You did a really good job integrating them into your sentences so that they flow and sound natural. The use of a lot of quotes also helps to back up your point even further. Overall, I really liked how focused your blog was and how you chose to be specific. Good job!
Hi there, Samiha!
ReplyDeleteI would like to say that the way you integrate your quotes is really amazing because it feels as if it is your own words/your own voice. As Nicole said, it flows very nicely. The organization of your blog also flows nicely; although I personally think that you should've switched the paragraphs. But great job!
Samiha, I agree with Nicole and Marcia. The thesis here is much better--much more specific and arguable--than in the Thoreau/Machiavelli blog post. You're paying attention! Nicely done.
ReplyDelete